Skip to main content

Sensual and Emotional Love - Pendular Characteristics - (4886)

One big characteristic of both sensual and emotional love is their pendular nature. Loved you yesterday, but not today and love you tomorrow again and the cycle repeats and repeats. This cycle leaves everyone worried, confused and asking the questions: Is there really love? Is this what real love is like? Why is it like this?


Question: Why are sensual and emotional love so pendular?
 

Answer: Two reasons. First reason is that one or more egos are present and those egos are about being pleased. They are dependent. 


In sensual and emotional love there is dependency. For there to be love felt in the sensual and emotional domains there must be felt the right sensations and the right emotions. If not the opposite of love appears: anger, resentment etc.


For the 'right sensations and emotions' to be felt the 'right impressions' must be given.


The right impressions can not always be there and in reality they are not and will never be.


The way out of any pendulum is always the consciousness. 


Basically we have to displace the egos that are always present. 


Bring more our consciousness. Our consciousness is not dependent. 


Give to ourselves from our consciousness that which we think we need until we one day see that we don't need it anymore, because we see that we are it. We will then give freely without needing some kind of return to continue giving. 


End (4886).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the Kundabuffer or Kundartiguador? - (405)

Introduction Gurdjieff and Master Samael spoke much about the Kundabuffer organ and a lot of what Master Samael said is pretty clear. This post is just about going over some of what he said. In the Quinto Evangelio, Master Samael also revealed many more details which do not appear in his books. Note, the Qunito Evangelio is a two tome compilation of transcriptions of many recordings of informal talks that Master Samael had with his students. English and Spanish Terms There are these two terms Kundartiguador and Kundabuffer which refer to the same thing. Kundartiguador is Spanish and Kundabuffer is English. I believe it was Gurdjieff who first introduced these terms in his book “Beelzebub’s Tales to his Grandson”. I believe “Beelzebub’s Tales to his Grandson” was not originally written in ether Spanish or English. So these terms Kundartiguador and Kundabuffer are translations where the word “Kunda” could not be translated and the ending "buffer" could b...

When We Speak Bad About Ourselves - Because of Self-Compassion - (2963)

Even Just Thinking Negative When we just even think, let alone speak about ourselves in a negative way, thinking things like: how we are really this and that bad and that is not at all what others see, that we are in capable, worth little, know nothing, can't do this and that, fail at this and that, a liar, a dreamer the list goes on... We can be 100% sure that self-compassion is behind this because pride by itself would never allow this.  In a case like this self-compassion taps into what pride hides from itself and others and exposes it. Feeling that it is doing job at ruining ourselves. Why It Does What It Does? Self-compassion does this sort of thing to avoid reprimand and to extract compassion from others. Self-compassion is about getting compassion for ourselves through others. It is set-up in relativity, using others as a reference point. Really the best thing that you can do for a person who is pitted against this ego is to ignore them, so that they can fa...

Embrace Motor Centre Lingo to Act - (6101)

To overcome the overthinking issue and the lamentation of not doing, we can use a key where we embrace the language of the motor centre. Before we do that we need to know the language of the motor centre. The language of the motor is action, it is doing. It is life in motion. It is starting, it is 'getting stuck into'  a task without reasoning.   "Get it done!" is the motto of the motor centre. "Let's find out!" is another. The motor centre modus operandi is not reasoning, that belongs to the intellect. So delaying and postponing is the intellect. It's not the motor centre. The motor centre is about doing. The more we just do something when we think of it or feel like no matter what the mind reasons (unless a very good physical reason) the more we are embracing the language of the motor centre.  Action without thinking. There has to be thinking but thinking aligned with doing, not thinking against doing. The motor is always doing. Not doing something...