Skip to main content

'For the Few' when not Understood Well - (3181)

'For the few', when not understood well creates some ideas in a person that are not very helpful for the work on themselves.

We can think that the spiritual work is too hard for us, that it is for certain others. That we are too weak, not spiritually cultured enough, not intelligent enough or just not capable. We may think that the work is very elitist.

We then also think that it is not for others as well and that others will not succeed it either. We usually export our believes and impose them on others.

Well it is all relative...

For the few is to be understood relatively and not taken to extremes where we think that we are not capable.

If we think we are not capable we don't really try with enough vigour and heart to break through. Our mind blocks our heart. The heart of everyone is powerful and everyone's heart can move the Law.

It is meant in the sense that it is not for the masses... But for a relative few - that is a small percentage of the large number in the masses.

On other planets everyone works for the self-realization and gets it. So the 'for the few' does not really apply for those planets.

Everyone has an essence and a Being and so really anyone can do the work. It is a natural function of anyone's own essence and consciousness.If someone does not get it today they will get it at some point in the future.

Also what stops us from succeeding in the work has been created by ourselves anyway. All of our karma and all of our egos are our very own creation. And we think that we can not undo what we have created - this does not make sense really - but if someone created something that same someone can un-create it.

End (3181).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the Kundabuffer or Kundartiguador? - (405)

Introduction Gurdjieff and Master Samael spoke much about the Kundabuffer organ and a lot of what Master Samael said is pretty clear. This post is just about going over some of what he said. In the Quinto Evangelio, Master Samael also revealed many more details which do not appear in his books. Note, the Qunito Evangelio is a two tome compilation of transcriptions of many recordings of informal talks that Master Samael had with his students. English and Spanish Terms There are these two terms Kundartiguador and Kundabuffer which refer to the same thing. Kundartiguador is Spanish and Kundabuffer is English. I believe it was Gurdjieff who first introduced these terms in his book “Beelzebub’s Tales to his Grandson”. I believe “Beelzebub’s Tales to his Grandson” was not originally written in ether Spanish or English. So these terms Kundartiguador and Kundabuffer are translations where the word “Kunda” could not be translated and the ending "buffer" could b...

When We Speak Bad About Ourselves - Because of Self-Compassion - (2963)

Even Just Thinking Negative When we just even think, let alone speak about ourselves in a negative way, thinking things like: how we are really this and that bad and that is not at all what others see, that we are in capable, worth little, know nothing, can't do this and that, fail at this and that, a liar, a dreamer the list goes on... We can be 100% sure that self-compassion is behind this because pride by itself would never allow this.  In a case like this self-compassion taps into what pride hides from itself and others and exposes it. Feeling that it is doing job at ruining ourselves. Why It Does What It Does? Self-compassion does this sort of thing to avoid reprimand and to extract compassion from others. Self-compassion is about getting compassion for ourselves through others. It is set-up in relativity, using others as a reference point. Really the best thing that you can do for a person who is pitted against this ego is to ignore them, so that they can fa...

Embrace Motor Centre Lingo to Act - (6101)

To overcome the overthinking issue and the lamentation of not doing, we can use a key where we embrace the language of the motor centre. Before we do that we need to know the language of the motor centre. The language of the motor is action, it is doing. It is life in motion. It is starting, it is 'getting stuck into'  a task without reasoning.   "Get it done!" is the motto of the motor centre. "Let's find out!" is another. The motor centre modus operandi is not reasoning, that belongs to the intellect. So delaying and postponing is the intellect. It's not the motor centre. The motor centre is about doing. The more we just do something when we think of it or feel like no matter what the mind reasons (unless a very good physical reason) the more we are embracing the language of the motor centre.  Action without thinking. There has to be thinking but thinking aligned with doing, not thinking against doing. The motor is always doing. Not doing something...