Why that difference? How is it that we can accept some statements or implications from certain people but others say the same thing and we get upset?
It feels mysterious as to why we can't accept some 'words' from certain individuals but from other individuals we can. We find ourselves say: "What is it about that person that just triggers me so much?".
It is said though that nothing is mysterious with the psyche, there is a reason for everything. The reason why resides in the fact that we have an accumulated history with that person that has developed a concept or belief about them.
It is really that belief that makes it so difficult for us to accept 'words' from them.
There is the concept which is a tough one to get over then there is the implication of the concept, which in many cases can be even more difficult to get over. So there is a double concept or belief at play, which is why we get so triggered into an upset state.
Let's see an example.
Because of the concept that a person is inferior, due to having less experience, due to the perception that they speak with their ego and haven't really experienced what are saying, that they are trying to take control, that they have less experience, that they are not living what they are preaching and so on and so on. Then for us to listen to them or take into account what they are saying, it is to accept the implication that we are below them and we think that we shouldn't be. So our reaction is rejection and conflict.
Consequently there is no wonder we get so triggered as they say. All due to the concepts and way of thinking that we have around that person or persons.
End (6117).

Comments
Post a Comment