About Ubiquity – (2404)

Introduction

The theme of ubiquity of the Being was treated in the retreat and I could understand it a little bit. Which honestly is much more than what I had previously understood. I still have many questions to ask though, and maybe one day those questions will be answered.

View

The retreat helped me to clarify the idea that I previously had about ubiquity. I previously thought that the gift of ubiquity was either one of two things.

The first thing that I thought it was, was that a Monad has an essence and that essence somehow uses the powers of its Monad to duplicate itself and appear in two places at the same time somehow using the science of Jinas. This is all very vague and does not add up really, if you analyse it.

The other version that I had in my mind was that a Monad divides Its essence into parts and each part enters a different human body.

Correct Version from Master Samael

Master Samael says that this (the latter) idea of ubiquity is half right and half wrong. He said that it is the same one and only soul, that is present in several vehicles (human bodies).

This seems better, in that the essence is not divided, but it is much unexplainable.

This gift of ubiquity serves the Monad in the sense that through the soul being able to participate in the human lives of several vehicles it can learn much more and develop much more widely through a large variety of life experiences.

Questions

This raises some questions. One is that one vehicle of a Monad could be working for the self-realisation while another vehicle could well be doing the opposite, such as fornicating (losing the sexual energy). How would that affect the Monad then? It feels like it would hamper the Monad wouldn’t it as that vehicle fornicating would be incurring karma for the itself and the Monad.

Another question is, if it is the same soul how does the soul participate in the life’s of several bodies. It is like a master control centre that has links into each vehicle?

Conclusion

I am grateful to have the correct idea of what ubiquity is at least. I don’t understand how it works yet. But one day this understanding will partly or fully come.

End (2404).