Definition
Definition is a result of changing one's reference point, as mentioned in a previous post.
Change Reference Points
Changing one’s reference point requires a kind of fusion with
that reference point. In other words, it implies a kind of ‘being one’ with
that reference point.
The maximum in changing reference points is to ‘be’ the new reference point. That is not easy, we can however start with alignment and polarisation with the new reference point, then go to identification
with it then later 'being it'.
 |
| Icarus chose his pride as his reference point. He should have chosen reality (wings made using wax) and his father as his reference point. |
Reference Point on the Essence
To have the reference point on our essence we have to have
some fusion or identification with that reference point. That is for sure!
When we think using the reference points of the ego we are
already identified with the identity of the ego. We have assumed its identity. The reference points make
up its identity or the identity that we get identified with.
To be identified with the mind or personality means we have
taken the mind and personality as our reference point.
Any argument is all about reference points. Change the reference
point drop the argument. Arguments are just a difference in mental positions,
i.e. reference points.
End (1359).
No comments:
Post a Comment